Understand the checks
Each public claim connects one reviewed person, one specific credential and jurisdiction, and one exact social account.
Identity is reviewed separately
Trained reviewers validate required evidence and connect it to the applicant through an independently obtained issuer contact or attended review. A name match, institutional email, or static document alone is insufficient. Identity checks are not infallible.
Credentials come from approved sources
Reviewers independently consult an approved authority or issuer. They record the fields and standing the source actually supplies. A registration record can match while current standing remains unknown. An uploaded certificate cannot approve itself.
An exact account must demonstrate access
A reviewer independently observes a random, single-use code in the exact account’s biography or original public post before it expires. A screenshot, a copied code on another account, or social login is insufficient. Account access is not legal ownership or proof of every video’s author.
Current status has limits
Checks have dates and freshness windows. Handle-only accounts use a shorter review interval because stable identity is unavailable. Current eligibility is calculated on each request, including when the worker is stopped. Credentials do not guarantee advice accuracy or authorize practice outside the listed jurisdiction.
Open the live record
Screenshots and copied share artwork are not proof. Open the authentic permanent status URL, compare the exact account, and consult the original authority for its latest status. No public record does not mean someone is unqualified.
Primary-source design references: NIST identity proofing, California Medical Board license verification. These sources do not certify Veriforium.
View current coverage